Hello Guest User, You are visiting this website from a computer with an IP address of 172.70.34.144 with the name of '?' since Thu Mar 28, 2024 at 4:51:54 AM PT for approx. 0 minutes now.
The Sheahan Diamond Literature Reference Compilation - Scientific and Media Articles based on Major Keyword - Ilmenite
The Sheahan Diamond Literature Reference Compilation is compiled by Patricia Sheahan who publishes on a monthly basis a list of new scientific articles related to diamonds as well as media coverage and corporate announcements called the Sheahan Diamond Literature Service that is distributed as a free pdf to a list of followers. Pat has kindly agreed to allow her work to be made available as an online digital resource at Kaiser Research Online so that a broader community interested in diamonds and related geology can benefit. The references are for personal use information purposes only; when available a link is provided to an online location where the full article can be accessed or purchased directly. Reproduction of this compilation in part or in whole without permission from the Sheahan Diamond Literature Service is strictly prohibited. Return to Diamond Keyword Index
Sheahan Diamond Literature Reference Compilation - Scientific Articles by Author for all years
Each article reference in the SDLRC is tagged with one or more key words assigned by Pat Sheahan to highlight the main topics of the article. In an effort to make it easier for users to track down articles related to a specific topic, KRO has extracted these key words and developed a list of major key words presented in this Key Word Index to which individual key words used in the article reference have been assigned. In most of the individual Key Word Reports the references are in crhonological order, though in some such as Deposits the order is first by key word and then chronological. Only articles classified as "technical" (mainly scientific journal articles) and "media" (independent media articles) are included in the Key Word Index. References that were added in the most recent monthly update are highlighted in yellow.
Ilmenite is an iron-titanium oxide mineral that is the primary ore from which titanium dioxide is derived. Ilmenite can occur within kimberlite whose ascending magma may entrain ilmenite whose occurrence is not restricted to the diamond stability field. Ilmenite is treated as a "kimberlite indicator mineral" as opposed to a "diamond indicator mineral" because its recovery in glaciated terrains that lack a natural abundance of ilmenite bearing rocks can point to a kimberlite source. This also applies in non-glaciated setting such as the Kalahari Desert where termite mounds are investigated for anomalous quantities of kimberlite indicator minerals. The presence of ilmenite may signal a nearby kimberlite but it conveys no information about diamond potential.
The occurrence and significance of xenocrysts of apatite, ilmenite and Sodium, iron, Titanium oxide in ultrapotassic lavas from the Leucite Hills, Wyoming
Mineralogical Magazine, Vol. 51, No. 360 pt. 2, Pp. 265-270
Recovery of non-magnetic minerals with a gravity magnetic seperator
American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers (AIME) Preprint, Annual Meeting held Phoenix Arizona Feb. 24-27th. 1992, Preprint No. 92-65, 6p
Dongre, A., Kamde, G., Chalapathi Rao, N.V., Kale, H.S.
Is megacrystic/xenocrystic ilmenite entrainment in the source magma responsible for the non-Diamondiferous nature of the Maddur-Kotakonda-Narayanpet kimberlites
Geological Society of India, Bangalore November Meeting Group Discussion on Kimberlites and Related Rocks India, Abstract p. 72.
Mineralogy and Petrology, 10.1007/s00710-018-0616-5 13p.
India
ilmentite
Abstract: Indian kimberlites occur in the Bastar craton (Central India) and in the Eastern Dharwar craton (EDC) Southern India. Nearly 100 kimberlite pipes have been discovered in the Eastern Dharwar craton of southern India, and they are distributed in three distinct fields: 1) the southern Wajrakarur kimberlite field (WKF); 2) the northern Narayanpet kimberlite field (NKF); and 3) the Raichur kimberlite field (RKF) (Chalapathi Rao et al, 2013). Nine kimberlites have been selected for this study: three came from the Siddanpalli cluster of RKF (SK-1, SK-2 and SK-3); other six kimberlites came from WKF, from Chigicherla (CC-4 and CC-5), Kalyandurg (KL-3 and KL-4), Lattavaram (P-3) and Mulligripally (P-5). The kimberlite emplacement took place during the Mesoproterozoic, around 1.1 Ga (Chalapathi Rao et al., 2013). Ilmenite is one of the classic diamond indicator minerals (DIMs) and for long it has been used as a guide for kimberlite exploration. The aim of this study is to evaluate the petrogenetic information that can be provided from the textural and geochemical study of the different ilmenite generations present in the Indian kimberlites studied in this work.
Abstract: We present new major element geochemical data, and review the existing data for ilmenite macrocrysts, megacrysts, as well as ilmenite in mantle xenoliths from four diamondiferous kimberlite fields in the Yakutian province. This combined data set includes 10,874 analyses of ilmenite from 94 kimberlite pipes. In the studied samples we identify various different ilmenite compositional distributions (e.g., “Haggerty's parabola”, or “Step-like” trends in MgO-Cr2O3 bivariate space), which are common to all kimberlites from a given cluster, but the compositional distributions differ between clusters. We propose three stages of ilmenite crystallization: 1) Mg-Cr poor ilmenite crystallising from a primitive asthenospheric melt (the base of Haggerty's parabola on MgO-Cr2O3 plots). 2) This primitive asthenospheric melt was then modified by the partial assimilation of lithospheric material, which enriched the melt in MgO and Cr2O3 (left branch of Haggerty’s parabola). 3) Ilmenite subsequently underwent sub-solidus recrystallization in the presence of an evolved kimberlite melt under increasing oxygen fugacity (ƒO2) conditions (right branch of Haggerty’s parabola in MgO-Cr2O3 plots). Significant differences in the ilmenite compositional distribution between different kimberlite fields are the result of diverse conditions during subsequent ilmenite crystallization in a kimberlite melt ascending through the lithospheric mantle, which have different textures and compositions beneath the studied kimberlite fields. We propose that a TiO2 fluid formed due to immiscibility of an asthenospheric melt with low Cr and high Ti contents. This fluid infiltrated lithospheric mantle rocks forming Mg-ilmenite. These features indicate a genetic link between ilmenite and the host kimberlite melt.
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, Vol. 175, 62 17p. Pdf
Mantle
ilmenite
Abstract: The Fe-Mg and Fe-Mn interdiffusion coefficients for ilmenite have been determined as a function of temperature and crystallographic orientation. Diffusion annealing experiments were conducted at 1.5 GPa between 800 and 1100 ?C. For Fe-Mg interdiffusion, each diffusion couple consisted of an ilmenite polycrystal and an oriented single crystal of geikielite. The activation energy (Q) and pre-exponential factor (D0) for Fe-Mg diffusion in the ilmenite polycrystal were found to be Q = 188±15 kJ mol?1 and logD0 = ?6.0±0.6 m2 s?1. For the geikielite single crystal, Fe-Mg interdiffusion has Q=220±16 kJ mol?1 and logD0=?4.6±0.7 m2 s?1. Our results indicate that crystallographic orientation did not significantly affect diffusion rates. For Fe-Mn interdiffusion, each diffusion couple consisted of one ilmenite polycrystal and one Mn-bearing ilmenite polycrystal. For Fe-Mn interdiffusion, Q = 264±30 kJ mol?1 and logD0 = ?2.9±1.3 m2 s?1 in the ilmenite. We did not find a significant concentration dependence for the Fe-Mg and Fe-Mn interdiffusion coefficients. In comparing our experimental results for cation diffusion in ilmenite with those previously reported for hematite, we have determined that cation diffusion is faster in ilmenite than in hematite at temperatures <1100 ?C. At oxygen fugacities near the wüstite-magnetite buffer, Fe and Mn diffusion rates are similar for ilmenite and titanomagnetite. We apply these experimentally determined cation diffusion rates to disequilibrium observed in ilmenites from natural volcanic samples to estimate the time between perturbation and eruption for the Bishop Tuff, Fish Canyon Tuff, Mt. Unzen, Mt. St. Helens, and kimberlites. When integrated with natural observations of chemically zoned ilmenite and constraints on pre-eruptive temperature and grain size, our experimentally determined diffusivities for ilmenite can be used to estimate a minimum time between magmatic perturbation and eruption on the timescale of hours to months.
Abstract: To provide new insights into the origin and evolution of kimberlitic magmas with different diamond concentrations from the Arkhangelsk diamond province in northwestern Russia, we examined the major-and trace-element compositions of ilmenite from diamondiferous kimberlite of the Grib pipe and diamond barren kimberlites from the Kepino cluster (Stepnaya and TsNIGRI-Arkhangelskaya pipes). Ilmenite from diamond-barren kimberlites shows lower Mg, Ti, Cr, Ni and Cu concentrations with increase in both Fe 3+ and Fe 2+ and Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf, Zn and V concentrations. The main differences between kimberlites with different diamond contents are the Nb and Zr concentrations and their correlation patterns with Mg and Cr concentrations. Ilmenite from the Grib kimberlite has Zr concentrations <110 ppm, whereas ilmenite from the Kepino kimberlites has Zr concentrations >300 ppm. Ilmenite crystallisation within the Grib kimberlite occurred under increasing oxygen fugacity (fO 2), which may reflect assimilation of mantle peridotite by the kimberlitic magmas. Ilmenite from the Kepino kimberlites suggests its crystallisation under constant fO 2 , with the ilmenite composition being controlled by processes of fractional crystallisation of megacrystic minerals. These assumptions were confirmed with assimilation-fractional crystallisation calculations. On the basis of obtained data, we developed a model for the evolution of the kimberlitic magmas for both diamon-diferous and barren kimberlites. The diamond-bearing kimberlitic magmas were generated under intense interaction of kimberlitic magmas with the surrounding lithospheric mantle. It may be that during early modification of the lithospheric mantle by kimberlitic magmas as well as with kimberlitic magmas' local stretching and swift ascent, the capture of the mantle xenoliths was favoured over the crystallisation of phenocrysts. The formation of barren kimberlitic magmas may have occurred when the lithospheric mantle in the vicinity of ascending magmas was already geochemically equilibrated with them. It also is possible that the magma's ascent slowed under conditions of dominantly compressive stresses with crystallisation of olivine and other megacrystic phases.