Kaiser Bottom Fish OnlineFree trialNew StuffHow It WorksContact UsTerms of UseHome
Specializing in Canadian Stocks
SearchAdvanced Search
Welcome Guest User   (more...)
Home / Education
Education
 

SDLRC - Core


The Sheahan Diamond Literature Reference Compilation - Scientific and Media Articles based on Major Keyword - Core
The Sheahan Diamond Literature Reference Compilation is compiled by Patricia Sheahan who publishes on a monthly basis a list of new scientific articles related to diamonds as well as media coverage and corporate announcements called the Sheahan Diamond Literature Service that is distributed as a free pdf to a list of followers. Pat has kindly agreed to allow her work to be made available as an online digital resource at Kaiser Research Online so that a broader community interested in diamonds and related geology can benefit. The references are for personal use information purposes only; when available a link is provided to an online location where the full article can be accessed or purchased directly. Reproduction of this compilation in part or in whole without permission from the Sheahan Diamond Literature Service is strictly prohibited. Return to Diamond Keyword Index
Sheahan Diamond Literature Reference Compilation - Scientific Articles by Author for all years
A-An Ao+ B-Bd Be-Bk Bl-Bq Br+ C-Cg Ch-Ck Cl+ D-Dd De-Dn Do+ E F-Fn Fo+ G-Gh Gi-Gq Gr+ H-Hd He-Hn Ho+ I J K-Kg Kh-Kn Ko-Kq Kr+ L-Lh
Li+ M-Maq Mar-Mc Md-Mn Mo+ N O P-Pd Pe-Pn Po+ Q R-Rh Ri-Rn Ro+ S-Sd Se-Sh Si-Sm Sn-Ss St+ T-Th Ti+ U V W-Wg Wh+ X Y Z
Sheahan Diamond Literature Reference Compilation - Media/Corporate References by Name for all years
A B C D-Diam Diamonds Diamr+ E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Each article reference in the SDLRC is tagged with one or more key words assigned by Pat Sheahan to highlight the main topics of the article. In an effort to make it easier for users to track down articles related to a specific topic, KRO has extracted these key words and developed a list of major key words presented in this Key Word Index to which individual key words used in the article reference have been assigned. In most of the individual Key Word Reports the references are in crhonological order, though in some such as Deposits the order is first by key word and then chronological. Only articles classified as "technical" (mainly scientific journal articles) and "media" (independent media articles) are included in the Key Word Index. References that were added in the most recent monthly update are highlighted in yellow.

Core refers to the inner and outer cores of the earth comprised mainly of iron though also containing alloys involving oxygen, nickel and sulphur. The inner core is solid while the outer core is liquid. The outer core is the source of the earth's magnetic field.

Core
Posted/
Published
AuthorTitleSourceRegionKeywords
DS1990-0285
1990
Carrigan, C.R., Eichelberger, J.C.Zoning of magmas by viscosity in volcanic conduitsNature, Vol. 343, Jan. 18, pp; 248-9.MantleVolcanics - eruptions, Core
DS1990-1528
1990
Wahr, J.Getting to the core. Earth's boundaryNature, Vol. 345, June 7, pp. 476-477GlobalMantle, Core boundary
DS1991-0712
1991
Hide, R., Dickey, J.O.Earth's variable rotationScience, Vol. 253, August 9, pp. 629-637GlobalEarth's rotation Geodesy, Core-mantle
DS1991-0891
1991
Knittle, E., Jeanloz, R.The high pressure phase diagram of FeO.94O: a possible constituent of theearth's coreJournal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 96, No. B 10, September 10, pp. 16, 169-16, 180GlobalCore-mantle boundary, Geophysics -seismics
DS1992-0186
1992
Buffett, B.A., Huppert, H.E., Lister, J.R., Woods, A.W.Analytical model for solidification of the earth's coreNature, Vol. 356, No. 6367, March 26, pp. 329-331MantleModel, Core
DS1992-0765
1992
Jacobs, J.A.The earth's core in a nutshellNature, Vol. 356, No. 6367, March 26, p. 286-287MantleCore, Geophysics, seismics
DS1992-1131
1992
Nyman, M.W., Law, R.D., Smelik, E.A.Cataclastic deformation mechanism for the development of core mantle structures in amphiboleGeology, Vol. 20, No. 5, May pp. 455-458WyomingMedicine Bow Mountains, Core-mantle
DS1992-1605
1992
Vidale, J.E., Benz, H.M.A sharp and flat section of the core-mantle boundaryNature, Vol. 359, No. 6396, October 15, pp. 627-629GlobalGeophysics, Mantle, Core-mantle
DS1993-0742
1993
Jeanloz, R., Lay, T.The core-mantle boundaryScientific American, May pp. 48-55MantleOverview of structure of earth, Tectonics, Core
DS1993-0979
1993
Masters, T.G.Core models ring true.. inner coreNature, Vol. 366, December 16, pp. 629-630MantleCore, Geophysics -seismics
DS1993-1779
1993
Wysession, M.E.How the core and mantle may produce mantle plumesEos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, Vol. 74, No. 4, January 26, p. 46.MantleCore, Plumes
DS1993-1780
1993
Wysession, M.E.A window to the coreNature, Vol. 361, No. 6412, Feb. 11, p. 495MantleGeophysics -seismics, Core
DS1993-1781
1993
Wysession, M.E.Geophysics: a window to the coreNature, Vol. 361, No. 6412, Feb. 11, pp. 495.MantleGeophysics, Core
DS1994-0653
1994
Grand, S.P.Mantle shear structure beneath the Americas and surrounding oceansJournal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 99, No. B6, June 10, pp. 11, 591-11, 621.United StatesMantle, Core mantle boundary
DS1994-1533
1994
Saxena, S.K., Shen, G., Lazor, P.Temperatures in earth's core based on melting and phase transformation experiments on iron.Science, Vol. 264, April 15, pp. 405-407.MantleCore, Temperature -iron melt
DS1994-1866
1994
Vogel, S.The big rush... superhot rocks in the earth's mantle...toward the coreEarth, Vol. 3, No. 2, March pp. 39-43MantleMantle plumes, hot spots, Core
DS1994-1867
1994
Vogel, S.The big rush... superhot rocks in the earth's mantle...toward the coreEarth, Vol. 3, No. 2, March pp. 39-43.MantleMantle plumes, hot spots, Core
DS1994-1871
1994
Walker, D.Is core formation a hot topicEos, Vol. 75, No. 4, January 25, p. 42, 43.MantleCore
DS1995-0857
1995
Ito, E., Morooka, K., Ujike, O., Katsura, T.Reactions between molten iron and silicate melts at high pressure:implications for chemical evolution coreJournal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 100, No. B4, April 10, pp. 5901-10.MantleCore, Geochemistry -earth
DS1995-1031
1995
Kruger, F., Weber, M., Scherbaum, F., Schkittenhardt, J.Evidence for normal and in homogeneous lowermost mantle and core mantle boundary structure under Arctic /CanadaGeophysical Journal of International, Vol. 122, No. 2, August pp. 637-657.Arctic, Northwest TerritoriesMantle, Core
DS1995-1081
1995
Leitch, A.M.Effects of temperature and mantle dynamics on estimates of the thermal conductivity in the deep mantle.Physics of the Earth and Plan. Interiors, Vol. 89, pp. 89-108.MantleCore mantle boundary
DS1995-1684
1995
ScienceEarth's solid iron core may skew its magnetic fieldScience, Vol. 267, No. 5206, March 11, p. 1910.MantleGeophysics -magnetics, Core
DS1995-1991
1995
Vidale, J.E., et al.Sounding the base of the mantle by core relectionsEos, Vol. 76, No. 46, Nov. 7. p.F404. Abstract.MantleCore, Geophysics -seismic
DS1995-2087
1995
Wysession, M.The inner workings of the earthAmerican Scientist, Vol. 83, March-April pp. 134-147.MantleCore, Geophysical interpretation and ideas
DS1996-0517
1996
GeotimesBrief review of paper on high speed computing and seismology... core mantleboundary...Geotimes, Vol. 41, No. 10, Oct. pp. 10-12.MantleGeophysics -seismic, Core-mantle boundary
DS1996-0647
1996
Honda, S., Iwase, Y.Comparison of the dynamic and parameterized models of mantle convection including core cooling.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 139, pp. 133-145.MantleConvection, Core, model
DS1996-0809
1996
Larson, R.L., Kincaid, C.Onset of mid-Cretaceous volcanism by elevation of the 670 km thermal boundary layerGeology, Vol. 24, No. 6, June pp. 551-554Mantle, crustSubduction, slab, Core-mantle boundary
DS1996-1567
1996
Wysession, M.E., et al.Slicing into the earthEos, Vol. 77, No. 48, Nov. 26, p. 477, 480, 81, 82.Appalachia, OntarioGeophysics - seismics, Core Mantle boundary
DS1997-0303
1997
Earle, P.R., Shearer, P.M.Observations of PKKP precursors used to estimate small scale topography on the core mantle boundary.Science, Vol. 277, No. 5326, Aug. 1, pp. 667-669.MantleCore-mantle boundary
DS1997-0514
1997
Holland, K.G., Ahrens, T.J.Melting of (magnesium, iron)(magnesium, iron)2 SiO4 at the core-mantle boundary of the earth.Science, Vol. 275, No. 5306, Mar. 14, pp. 1623-25.MantleMelting, Core-mantle boundary
DS1997-0594
1997
Kesson, S., Ringwood, A.E., Hibberson, W., Fit Gerald, J.Reaction between magnesiowustite of lower mantle composition and core-forming alloy at 1-40 GPa.American Mineralogist, Vol. 82, No. 5-6, May-June pp. 526-533.MantleCore, History of earth
DS1997-0599
1997
Kilburn, M.R., Wood, B.J.Metal silicate partitioning and the incompatibility of S and Si during coreformation.Earth and Plan. Sci. Letters, Vol. 152, No. 1-4, pp. 139-148.MantleCore, Silicates, silicon, sulfur
DS1997-0830
1997
Murthy, V.R., Karato, S.Core formation and chemical equilibrium in the earth. II Chemical consequences for the mantle and core.Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Vol. 100, No. 1-3, pp.MantleGeochemistry, Core
DS1998-0213
1998
Carlson, R.W.Earth sciences: a conduit to the coreNature, Vol. 394, No. 6688, July 2, p. 11.MantleCore
DS1998-0619
1998
Hillgren, V.J., Boehler, R.high pressure reactions between light metals and silicates; Implications for the light element ....Mineralogical Magazine, Goldschmidt abstract, Vol. 62A, p. 624-5.MantleCore-mantle boundary, light rare earth element (LREE).
DS1998-0629
1998
Hofmann, A.W.Geochemical reservoirs and whole mantle convectionMineralogical Magazine, Goldschmidt abstract, Vol. 62A, p. 640-1.MantleCore-mantle boundary, Geochemistry
DS1998-1504
1998
Vacquier, V.A theory of the origin of the Earth's internal heatTectonophysics, Vol. 291, No. 1-4, June 15, pp. 1-8.MantleCore, Melt
DS1999-0066
1999
Bills, B.G.Tidal despinning of the mantle, inner core superrotation and outer core effective viscosity.Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 104, No. 2, Feb. 10, pp. 2653-66.MantleCore
DS1999-0085
1999
Botvinovsky, V.V.Differential current loop at boundary of Earth's inner core as a model of source of the major magnetic fieldRussian Geology and Geophysics, Vol. 40, No. 9, pp. 1355-MantleCore - boundary, Geophysics - magnetics
DS2000-0117
2000
Buffett, B.A.Earth' core and the geodynamoScience, Vol. 288, No. 5473, June 16, pp. 2007.MantleCore, Geodynamics
DS2000-0298
2000
Forte, A.M., Mitrovica, J.X.A high viscosity layer in Earth's lower mantle: implications for deep mantle flow and mixing.Geological Association of Canada (GAC)/Mineralogical Association of Canada (MAC) 2000 Conference, 2p. abstract.MantleGeophysics - seismics tomography, Core mantle boundary
DS2000-0728
2000
Oliver, D.H.Superplumes and rotation induced flow along the CMBGeological Society of America (GSA) Abstracts, Vol. 32, No. 7, p.A-314.MantleCore mantle boundary
DS2000-1010
2000
Wen, L.Intense seismic scattering near the Earth's core-mantle boundary beneath the Coromos hotspot.Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 27, No. 22, Nov. 15, pp. 3627-30.MantleGeophysics - seismics, Core - boundary
DS2001-0249
2001
Deuss, A., Woodhouse, J.Seismic observations of splitting of the mid-transition zone discontinuity in Earth's mantle.Science, No. 5541, Oct. 12, pp. 354-6.MantleGeophysics - seismics, Core mantle boundary
DS2001-0272
2001
Dubrovinsky, L., et al.Chemical interaction of iron and Al2O3 as a source of heterogeneity at the Earth's core - mantle boundary.Nature, No. 8636, Aug. 2, pp. 527-9.MantleGeochemistry, Core - boundary
DS2001-0495
2001
Hutchison, M.T., Hursthouse, M.B., Light, M.E.Mineral inclusions in diamonds: associations and chemical distinctions around the 670 km discontinuity.Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, Vol. 142, No. 1, Oct. pp.119-126.MantleDiamond - inclusions, Core mantle boundary
DS2001-0647
2001
Labroose, S., Poirier, J.P., Lemouel, J.L.The age of the inner coreEarth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 190, No. 3-4, pp. 111-123.MantleCore - boundary, Geochronology
DS2001-0769
2001
Melbourne, T., Helmberger, D.Mantle control of plate boundary deformationGeophysical Research Letters, Vol. 28, No. 20, Oct. 15, pp. 4003-6.MantleTectonics, Core mantle boundary
DS2001-0824
2001
Narteau, C., Le Mouel, Poirier, Sepulveda, ShnirmanOn a small scale roughness of the core mantle boundaryEarth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 191, No. 1-2, Aug. 30, pp. 49-60.MantleCore - boundary
DS2001-0987
2001
Rost, S., Revenaugh, J.Seismic detection of rigid zone at the top of the coreScience, No. 5548, Nov. 30, pp. 1911-13.MantleGeophysics - seismics, Core - boundary
DS2001-1044
2001
Scott, H.P., Williams, Q., Knittle, E.Stability and equation of state of Fe3C to 73 GPa: implications for carbonin the Earth's core.Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 28, No. 9, May 1, pp. 1875-8.MantleCore, Carbon
DS2001-1058
2001
Sharaskin, A.Y., Knipper, A.L.The nature of the crust mantle boundary in ophiolite sequencesDoklady Academy of Sciences, Vol. 380, No. 7, Sept-Oct. pp. 812-4.MantleOphiolites, Core mantle boundary
DS2001-1065
2001
Shim, S.H., Duffy, T.S., Shen, G.Stability and structure of MgSiO3 perovskite to 2300 km depth in Earth's mantleScience, Vol. 5539, Sept. 28, pp. 2437-9.MantleCore mantle boundary, Geochemistry
DS2001-1118
2001
Stacey, F.D.Finite strain, thermodynamics and the Earth's corePhysics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Vol. 128, No. 1-4, Dec. 10, pp. 179-83.MantleCore-mantle
DS2001-1225
2001
Wen, L.Seismic evidence for a rapidly varying compositional anomaly at the base of the Earth's mantle beneath IndiaEarth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 194, No. 1-2, pp. 83-95.Indian OceanGeophysics - seismics, Core mantle boundary
DS2001-1293
2001
Zatman, S.Phase relations for high frequency core-mantle coupling and Earth's axial angular momentum budget.Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Vol. 128, No. 1-4, Dec. 10, pp. 163-78.MantleCore-mantle
DS2001-1294
2001
Zatman, S.Phase relations for high frequency core mantle coupling and the Earth's axial angular momentum budget.Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Vol. 128, No. 1-4, pp. 163-78.MantleTectonics, Core mantle boundary
DS2002-0694
2002
Hedlin, M.A., Shearer, P.M.Probing mid-mantle heterogeneity using PKP coda wavesPhysics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Vol. 130, No. 3-4, pp. 195-208.MantleGeophysics - seismics, Core-mantle boundary
DS2002-0705
2002
Hemley, R.J., Mao, H.K.New windows on earth and planetary interiorsMineralogical Magazine, Vol.66, 6, pp. 791-812.MantleCore
DS2002-0720
2002
Hirose, K.Phase transitions in pyrolitic mantle around 670 - km depth: implications for upwelling of plumes from the lower mantle.Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 107, 4, ECV-3 ( approx. 15 p.)MantleGeophysics - seismics, Core Mantle boundary
DS2002-0809
2002
Karato, S., Forte, A.M.,Liebermann, R.C., Masters, G., Stixrude, L.Earth's deep interior: mineral physics and tomography from the atomic to the global scale.American Geophysical Union, Geophysical Monograph Series, 117,289p., 289p.MantleBook - geodynamics, seismic tomography, core, boundary, Discontinuities, mantle minerals, mantle structure
DS2002-0834
2002
Kesson, S.E., Fitzgerald, J.D., O'Neill, H.St. C., Shelley, J.M.G.Partitioning of iron between magnesian silicate perovskite and magnesiowuestite at about 1 Mbar.Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Vol. 131, 3-4, Aug. 30, pp. 295-310.MantleDiscontinuity, core mantle boundary
DS2002-0938
2002
Li, A., Fischer, K.M., Van Der Lee, S., Wysession, M.E.Crust and upper mantle discontinuity structure beneath eastern North AmericaJournal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 107, No. 5, ESE7AppalachiaGeophysics - seismics, Core-mantle boundary
DS2002-0949
2002
Linn, J.F., Heintz, D.C., Campbell, A.J., Devine, J.M., Mao, W.L., Shen, G.Iron nickel alloy in the Earth's coreGeophysical Research Letters, Vol. 29,10,May15,pp.108-MantleCore-mantle boundary
DS2002-0973
2002
Luo, S.N., Ni, S., Helmberger, D.Relationship of D structure with the velocity variations near the inner core boundaryGeophysical Research Letters, Vol. 29, 11, pp. 22- DOI 10.1029/2001GLO13907MantleGeophysics - seismics, Core-mantle boundary
DS2002-1516
2002
Smythe, J.R., Frost, D.J.The effect of water on the 410 km discontinuity. An experimental studyGeophysical Research Letters, Vol. 29,10,May15,pp.123-MantleCore-mantle boundary
DS2002-1741
2002
Wright, C., Kwadiba, M.T., Kgaswane, E.M., Simon, R.E.The structure of the crust and upper mantle to depths of 320 km beneath the KaapvaalJournal of African Earth Sciences, Vol. 35, 4, pp. 477-88.South AfricaGeophysics - seismics, Core mantle boundary
DS2003-0354
2003
Dubrovinsky, L., Dubrovinskaia, N., Langenhorst, F., Dobson, D., Robie, D.Iron silica interaction at extreme conditions and the electrically conducting layer at theNature, No. 6927, March 6, pp. 58-60.MantleCore mantle boundary, Geochemistry
DS2003-1216
2003
Sawbridge, M.An ensemble view of Earth's inner coreScience, Vol. 299, 5606, Jan 24, p. 529.MantleCore boundary
DS200412-0134
2004
Bercovici, D., Karato, S.The transition zone water filter model: geochemical implications.Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 13th Goldschmidt Conference held Copenhagen Denmark, Vol. 68, 11 Supp. July, ABSTRACT p.A559.MantleCore, mantle boundary
DS200412-0994
2002
Kesson, S.E., Fitzgerald, J.D., O'Neill, H.St.C., Shelley, J.M.G.Partitioning of iron between magnesian silicate perovskite and magnesiowuestite at about 1 Mbar.Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Vol. 131, 3-4, Aug. 30, pp. 295-310.MantleDiscontinuity, core mantle boundary
DS200412-1396
2004
Nakagawa, T., Tackley, P.J.Effects of thermo-chemical mantle convection on the thermal evolution of the Earth's core.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 220, 1-2, March 30, pp. 107-119.MantleGeothermometry, core mantle boundary, convection
DS200412-1991
2003
Thybo, H., Ross, A.R., Egorkin, A.V.Explosion seismic reflections from the Earth's core.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 216, 4, Dec. 10, pp. 693-702.MantleCore, mantle boundary, geophysics
DS200412-2076
2004
Walter, M.J., TRonnes, R.G.Early Earth differentiation.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 225, 3-4, Sept. 15, pp. 253-269.MantleCore, proto-crust, geochronology, Ni Co, partitioning
DS200412-2212
2004
Zhao, D.Global tomographic images of mantle plumes and subducting slabs: insight into deep Earth dynamics.Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Vol. 146, 1-2, pp. 3-34.MantleGeothermometry, tomography, hotspots, core mantle bound
DS200512-0122
2004
Burke, K., Torsvik, T.H.Derivation of large igneous provinces of the past 200 million years from long term heterogeneities in the deep mantle.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 227, 3-4, Nov. 15, pp. 531-538.MantlePlume, paleomagnetics, seismic tomography, core-mantle
DS200512-0128
2005
Butler, S.L., Peltier, W.R., Costin, S.O.Numerical models of the Earth's thermal history: effects of inner-core solidification and core potassium.Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Vol. 152, 1-2. Sept. 15, pp. 22-42.MantlePotassium, geothermometry, core history
DS200512-0309
2005
Galimov, E.M.Redox evolution of the Earth caused by a multi stage formation of its core.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 233, 3-4, May 15, pp. 263-276.MantleGeothermometry, core-mantle boundary
DS200512-0399
2005
Hansen, U.Generation and evolution of plumes in mantle-relevant scenarios.Chapman Conference held in Scotland August 28-Sept. 1 2005, 1p. abstractMantleMantle plume, core-mantle boundary
DS200512-0518
2005
Keshav, S., Van Orman, J.A.Re Os Pt partitioning in sulfur bearing solid/molten iron metals at 3-22 GPa and 1300-1775 C: is the Earth's outer core so giving?Chapman Conference held in Scotland August 28-Sept. 1 2005, 1p. abstractMantleMantle plume, core-mantle boundary
DS200512-0536
2005
King, S.D.How many hotspots can be explained by edge driven convection?Chapman Conference held in Scotland August 28-Sept. 1 2005, 1p. abstractMantleMantle plume, core-mantle boundary
DS200512-0604
2005
Lay, T.Is the D' region the source of mantle plumes?Chapman Conference held in Scotland August 28-Sept. 1 2005, 1p. abstractMantleMantle plume, core-mantle boundary
DS200512-0662
2005
Lustrino, M.How the delamination and detachment of lower crust can influence basaltic magmatism.Earth Science Reviews, Vol. 72, 1-2, Sept. pp. 21-38.MantleMagmatism, plume, core-boundary, eclogite, pyroxenite
DS200512-0764
2005
Nakagawa, T., Tackley, P.J.Deep mantle heat flow and thermal evolution of the Earth's core in thermochemical multiphase models of mantle convection.Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems: G3, Vol. 6, doi. 10.1029/2005 GC000967MantleCore, mantle boundary, geothermometry
DS200512-0881
2005
Puchtel, I.S., Brandon, A.D., Humayun, M., Walker, R.J.Evidence for the early differentiation of the core from Pt-Re-Os isotope systematics of 2.8 Ga komatiites.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 237, 1-2, Aug, 30, pp. 118-134.Europe, Baltic ShieldGeochronology, core-mantle interaction
DS200512-0976
2005
Sheth, H.C.The Deccan beyond the plume hypothesis.Chapman Conference held in Scotland August 28-Sept. 1 2005, 1p. abstractIndiaMantle plume, core-mantle boundary
DS200512-1002
2005
Skorodumova, N.V., Belonoshko, A.B., Huang, L., Ahuja, R., Johansson, B.Stability of the MgCO3 structures under lower mantle conditions.American Mineralogist, Vol.90, pp. 1008-1011.MantleCarbon, Liquid outer core, boundary
DS200512-1093
2005
Tolstikhin, I., Hofmann, A.W.Early crust on top of the Earth's core.Physics of the Earth and Planetary Letters, Vol. 148, 2-4, Feb. pp. 109-130.MantleGeochemistry, core mantle boundary, rare gases, REE
DS200612-0328
2006
Deuss, A., Redfern, A.T., Chambers, K., Woodhouse, J.H.The nature of the 660 kilometer discontinuity in Earth's mantle from global seismic observations of PP Precursors.Science, Vol. 311, 5758, Jan. 13, pp. 198-200.MantleGeophysics - seismics, core mantle boundary
DS200612-0523
2006
Halliday, A.N.The origin of the Earth .. What's new?Elements, Vol. 3, no. 4, August pp. 205-210.MantleGeochemistry, core, isotopes
DS200612-0882
2006
Matyska, C., Yuen, D.A.Lower mantle dynamics with the post perovskite phase change, radiative thermal conductivity, temperature and depth dependent viscosity.Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Vol. 154, 2, Feb. 16, pp. 196-207.MantleGeothermometry, core mantle boundary
DS200612-1589
2006
Zhan, X., Zhu, R., Liao, X.On thermal interaction between the Earth's core and mantle: an annular channel Model.Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Vol. 159, 1-2, pp. 96-108.MantleGeothermometry, core convection, geodynamics
DS200712-0068
2007
Belonoshko, A.B.Origin of the low rigidity of the Earth's Inner core.Science, Vol. 316 5831 June 15, pp. 1603-1605.MantleCore
DS200712-0069
2007
Belonoshko, A.B.Origin of the low rigidity of the Earth's Inner core.Science, Vol. 316 5831 June 15, pp. 1603-1605.MantleCore
DS200712-0315
2007
Fiquet, G., Coltice, N.,Guyot, F., Gillet, P.Potassium content in the Earth's core: a high pressure and high temperature study of the Fe K system.Plates, Plumes, and Paradigms, 1p. abstract p. A279..MantleCore, mantle boundary
DS200712-0378
2007
Gramling, C.X-Ray eyes in the sky: scientists are working on satellites that will see far below the planet's surface, better understand structure and compositionGeotimes, Vol. 52, 7, pp. 24-27.MantleCrust, mantle, core
DS200712-0626
2007
Lin, J.F.Spin transition zone in Earth's lower mantle.Science, Vol. 317, 5845, pp. 1740-1742.MantleCore, boundary
DS200812-0302
2008
Dumberry, M.Gravitational torque on the inner core and decadal polar motion.Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 172, no. 3, March pp. 903-920.MantleCore
DS200812-0303
2008
Dumberry, M.Decadal variations in gravity caused by a tilt of the inner core.Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 172, no. 3, March pp. 921-933.MantleCore
DS200812-0352
2008
Fiquet, G., Guyot, F., Badro, J.The Earth's lower mantle and core.Elements, Vol. 4, 3, June pp. 177-182.MantleCore, differentiation
DS200812-0419
2008
Golabek, G.J., Schmelling, H., Tackley, P.J.Earth's core formation aided by flow channelling instabilities induced by iron diapirs.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 271, 1-4, pp. 24-33.MantleCore, iron
DS200812-0621
2008
Kuwayama, Y., Horise, K., Sata, N., Ohisi, Y.Phase relations of iron and iron-nickel alloys up to 300 GPa:implications for composition and structure of the Earth's inner core.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 273, 3-4 pp. 379-385.MantleCore, chemistry
DS200812-0927
2008
Prutkin, L.Gravitational and magnetic models of the core-mantle boundary and their correlation.Journal of Geodyanmics, Vol. 45, 2-3, March pp. 146-153.MantleCore, mantle boundary, gravity
DS200812-0928
2008
Pushcharovsky, Y.M., Pushcharovsky, D.Y.The middle mantle of the Earth.Geotectonics, Vol. 42, 1, pp. 1-7.MantleCore, boundary
DS200812-1121
2008
Steinberger, B., Home, R.Mantle flow models with core-mantle boundary constraints and chemical heterogeneities in the lowermost mantle.Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 113, B )5403MantleMantle flow, core-mantle boundary
DS200912-0166
2008
Denisov, G.G.,Novikov, V.V., Federov, A.E.Gravitational interactions of the solid core and the Earth's mantle and variations in the length of the day.Astronomy Reports, Vol. 52, 12, pp. 1027-1034.MantleCore
DS200912-0769
2008
Torsvik, T.H., Steinberger, B., Cocks, L.R.M., Burke, K.Longitude: linking Earth's ancient surface to its deep interior.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 276, 3-4, Dec. pp. 273-382.MantlePalemagnetism, core-mantle boundary
DS201012-0428
2009
Lee, K.K.M.The enigma of 'D'.Nature, Vol. 462, Dec. 10, pp. 731-732.MantleCore, boundary
DS201112-0023
2011
Anfilogov, V.N., Khachai, Yu.A.A possible scenario of material differentiation at the initial stage of the Earth's formation.Deep Seated Magmatism, its sources and plumes, Ed. Vladykin, N.V., pp. 126-131.MantleComplexity of dense iron core and silicate mantle
DS201112-0392
2011
Gubbins, D.A bouyancy profile for the Earth's core.Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 187, 2, pp. 549-563.MantleCore
DS201112-0401
2010
Haggerty, S.Diamond dynamics: modern views through ancient windows.5th Brasilian Symposium on Diamond Geology, Nov. 6-12, abstract p. 12.MantleCore, Carbon, Methane, Subduction
DS201212-0282
2012
Hansen, S.E., Nyblade, A.A., Benoit, M.H.Mantle structure beneath Africa and Arabia from adaptively parameterized P-wave tomography: implications for the origin of Cenozoic Afro-Arabian tectonism.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 319-320, pp. 23-34.AfricaCore, mantle boundary
DS201212-0787
2012
Wimer, J., Hier-Majander, S.A three dimensional microgeodynamic model of melt geometry in the Earth's deep interior.Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 117, B4, B009012MantleCore, mantle boundary
DS201312-0235
2013
Earth Sky NewsHow the Earth formed. Based on Stanford scientist report.Earth Sky News, Oct. 14, 3p.Core, mantle
DS201312-0560
2014
Lythgoe, K.H., Deuss, A., Rudge, J.F., Neufeld, J.A.Earth's inner core: innermost inner core or hemispherical variations?Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 385, pp. 181-189.MantleCore
DS201312-0580
2013
Martorell, B., Vocadlo, L., Brodholt, J., Wood, I.G.Strong premelting effect in the elastic properties of hcp-Fe under inner core conditions.Science, Vol. 342, 6157, pp. 466-468.MantleCore, melting
DS201312-0657
2013
Nowacki, A.Seismic anisotropy and deformation at mid-ocean ridges and in the lowermost mantle.Springer, $ 109.99 ebookMantleCore, mantle boundary
DS201312-0675
2012
Otsuka, K., Karato, S-I.Deep penetration of molten iron into the mantle caused by morphological instability.Nature, Vol. 492, Dec. 13, pp. 243-246.MantleIron, core
DS201312-0925
2013
Tsuchiya, T., Kawai, K., Maruyama, S.Expanding-contracting Earth.Geoscience Frontiers, Vol. 4, 3, pp. 341-347.MantleCore, dynamics
DS201412-0715
2014
Pushkarev, Y.D.Fundamental problems of the Earth evolution and the nature of D" layer as one of them.Deep Seated Magmatism, its sources and plumes, Ed. Vladykin, N.V., pp. 104-123.MantleCore, mantle boundary
DS201412-0987
2014
Wood, B., Fei, Y., Sharar, A., Corgne, A., Bouhifd, A.Formation and evolution and composition of Earth's core.Goldschmidt Conference 2014, 1p. AbstractMantleCore
DS201504-0188
2015
Cerantola, V., Walte, N.P., Rubie, D.C.Deformation of a crystalline olivine aggregate containing two immiscible liquids: implications for early core-mantle differentiation.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 417, pp. 67-77.MantleCore, mantle

Abstract: Deformation-assisted segregation of metallic and sulphidic liquid from a solid peridotitic matrix is a process that may contribute to the early differentiation of small planetesimals into a metallic core and a silicate mantle. Here we present results of an experimental study using a simplified system consisting of a polycrystalline Fo90-olivine matrix containing a small percentage of iron sulphide and a synthetic primitive MORB melt, in order to investigate whether the silicate melt enhances the interconnection and segregation of FeS liquid under deformation conditions at varying strain rates. The experiments have been performed at 2 GPa, 1450?°C and strain rates between 1×10?3 s?11×10?3 s?1 to 1×10?5 s?11×10?5 s?1. Our results show that the presence of silicate melt actually hinders the migration and segregation of sulphide liquid by reducing its interconnectivity. At low to moderate strain rates the sulphide liquid pockets preserved a roundish shape, showing the liquid behavior is governed mainly by surface tension rather than by differential stress. Even at the highest strain rates, insignificant FeS segregation and interconnection were observed. On the other hand the basaltic melt was very mobile during deformation, accommodating part of the strain, which led to its segregation from the matrix at high bulk strains leaving the sulphide liquid stranded in the olivine matrix. Hence, we conclude that deformation-induced percolation of sulphide liquid does not contribute to the formation of planetary cores after the silicate solidus is overstepped. A possible early deformation enhanced core-mantle differentiation after overstepping the Fe-S solidus is not possible between the initial formation of silicate melt and the formation of a widespread magma ocean.
DS201504-0213
2015
Prescher, C., Dubrovinsky, L., Bykova, E., Kupenko, I., Glazyrin, K.High Poisson's ration of Earth's inner core explained by carbon alloying.Nature Geoscience, Vol. 8, 3, pp. 220-223.MantleCore, carbon
DS201504-0221
2015
Souriau, A.Presumption of large scale heterogeneity at the top of the outer core basal layer.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 415, April pp. 175-182.MantleCore
DS201504-0225
2015
Tateno, S., Kuwayama, Y., Hirose, K., Ohishi, Y.The structure of Fe-Si alloy in Earth's inner core.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 418, pp. 11-18.MantleCore
DS201506-0278
2015
Justo, J.F., Morra, G., Yuen, D.A.Viscosity undulations in the lower mantle: the dynamical role of iron spin transition.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 421, pp. 20-26.MantleCore
DS201509-0392
2015
Davies, C., Pozzo, M., Gubbins, D., Alfe, D.Constraints from material properties on the dynamics and evolution of Earth's core.Nature Geoscience, Vol. 8, pp. 678-785.MantleHT - core evolution

Abstract: The Earth’s magnetic field is powered by energy supplied by the slow cooling and freezing of the liquid iron core. Efforts to determine the thermal and chemical history of the core have been hindered by poor knowledge of the properties of liquid iron alloys at the extreme pressures and temperatures that exist in the core. This obstacle is now being overcome by high-pressure experiments and advanced mineral physics computations. Using these approaches, updated transport properties for FeSiO mixtures have been determined at core conditions, including electrical and thermal conductivities that are higher than previous estimates by a factor of two to three. Models of core evolution with these high conductivities suggest that the core is cooling much faster than previously thought. This implies that the solid inner core formed relatively recently (around half a billion years ago), and that early core temperatures were high enough to cause partial melting of the lowermost mantle. Estimates of core-mantle boundary heat flow suggest that the uppermost core is thermally stratified at the present day.
DS201601-0017
2015
Georg, R.B., Shahar, A.The accretion and differentiation of Earth under oxidizing conditions.American Mineralogist, Vol. 100, pp. 2739-2748.MantleCore, formation

Abstract: We present a new approach to model planetary accretion and continuous core formation, and discuss the implications if Earth accreted under conditions initially more oxidized than the modern day mantle. The modified model uses the same partitioning data that were previously used to model accretion under reducing conditions, however, changing the partitioning between accreting metal and silicate mantle means that reducing conditions fail to meet expected core/mantle values. Instead, the model requires conditions more oxidized than the modern day mantle to converge and to yield expected elemental core/mantle distribution values for moderately siderophile elements. The initial oxygen fugacity required to provide the crucial level of oxidation is approximately ?IW ~ ?1.2 to ?1.7 and thus is in the range of carbonaceous and ordinary chondrites. The range of peak pressures for metal silicate partitioning is 60-6 GPa and oxygen fugacity must decrease to meet modern FeO mantle contents as accretion continues. Core formation under oxidizing conditions bears some interesting consequences for the terrestrial Si budget. Although the presented partitioning model can produce a Si content in the core of 5.2 wt%, oxidizing accretion may limit this to a maximum of ~3.0 to 2.2 wt%, depending on the initial fO2 in BSE, which places bulk earth Mg/Si ratio between 0.98-1.0. In addition, under oxidizing conditions, Si starts partitioning late during accretion, e.g., when model earth reached >60% of total mass. As a consequence, the high P-T regime reduces the accompanied isotope fractionation considerably, to 0.07‰ for 5.2 wt% Si in the core. The isotope fractionation is considerably less, when a maximum of 3.0 wt% in the core is applied. Under oxidizing conditions it becomes difficult to ascertain that the Si isotope composition of BSE is due to core-formation only. Bulk Earth’s Si isotope composition is then not chondritic and may have been inherited from Earth’s precursor material.
DS201604-0623
2016
Rollinson, H.Surprises from the top of the mantle transition zone.Geology Today, Vol. 32, 2, pp. 58-64.MantleCore, boundary

Abstract: Recent studies of chromite deposits from the mantle section of ophiolites have revealed a most unusual collection of minerals present as inclusions within the chromite. The initial discoveries were of diamonds from the Luobosa ophiolite in Tibet. Further work has shown that mantle chromitites from ophiolites in Tibet, the Russian Urals and Oman contain a range of crustal minerals including zircon, and a suite of highly reducing minerals including carbides, nitrides and metal alloys. Some of the minerals found represent very high pressure phases indicating that their likely minimum depth is close to the top of the mantle transition zone. These new results suggest that crustal materials may be subducted to mantle transition zone depths and subsequently exhumed during the initiation of new subduction zones-the most likely environment for the formation of their host ophiolites. The presence of highly reducing phases indicates that at mantle transition zone depths the Earth's mantle is "super"-reducing.
DS201606-1114
2016
Shahar, A.Pressure dependent isotopic composition of iron alloys.Science, Vol. 352, 6285, pp. 580-582.MantleCore

Abstract: Our current understanding of Earth’s core formation is limited by the fact that this profound event is far removed from us physically and temporally. The composition of the iron metal in the core was a result of the conditions of its formation, which has important implications for our planet’s geochemical evolution and physical history. We present experimental and theoretical evidence for the effect of pressure on iron isotopic composition, which we found to vary according to the alloy tested (FeO, FeHx, or Fe3C versus pure Fe). These results suggest that hydrogen or carbon is not the major light-element component in the core. The pressure dependence of iron isotopic composition provides an independent constraint on Earth’s core composition.
DS201606-1118
2016
Solomatova, N.V., Jackson, J.M., Sturhahn, W., Wicks, J.K., Zhao, J., Toellner, T.S., Kalkan, B., Steinhardt, W.M.Equation of state and spin crossover of ( Mg,Fe)O at high pressure, with implications for explaining topographic relief at the core mantle boundary.American Mineralogist, Vol. 101, 5, pp. 1084-1093.MantleCore, mantle boundary
DS201606-1124
2016
Uggerhoj, U.I., Mikkelsen, R.E., Faye, J.Earth's core is two and half years younger than its crust.European Journal of Physics, Vol. 37, 3, 7p.MantleCore
DS201609-1703
2016
Badro, J., Siebert, J., Ninmo, F.An early geodynamo driven by exsolution of mantle components from Earth's core.Nature, Vol. 536, Aug. 18, pp. 326-328.MantleCore, mantle boundary

Abstract: Recent palaeomagnetic observations1 report the existence of a magnetic field on Earth that is at least 3.45 billion years old. Compositional buoyancy caused by inner-core growth2 is the primary driver of Earth’s present-day geodynamo3, 4, 5, but the inner core is too young6 to explain the existence of a magnetic field before about one billion years ago. Theoretical models7 propose that the exsolution of magnesium oxide—the major constituent of Earth’s mantle—from the core provided a major source of the energy required to drive an early dynamo, but experimental evidence for the incorporation of mantle components into the core has been lacking. Indeed, terrestrial core formation occurred in the early molten Earth by gravitational segregation of immiscible metal and silicate melts, transporting iron-loving (siderophile) elements from the silicate mantle to the metallic core8, 9, 10 and leaving rock-loving (lithophile) mantle components behind. Here we present experiments showing that magnesium oxide dissolves in core-forming iron melt at very high temperatures. Using core-formation models11, we show that extreme events during Earth’s accretion (such as the Moon-forming giant impact12) could have contributed large amounts of magnesium to the early core. As the core subsequently cooled, exsolution7 of buoyant magnesium oxide would have taken place at the core-mantle boundary, generating a substantial amount of gravitational energy as a result of compositional buoyancy. This amount of energy is comparable to, if not more than, that produced by inner-core growth, resolving the conundrum posed by the existence of an ancient magnetic field prior to the formation of the inner core.
DS201702-0238
2017
Righter, K., Nickodem, K., Pando, K., Danielson, L., Boujibar, A., Righter, M., Lapen, T.J.Distribution of Sb, As, Ge and in between metal and silicate during acccretion and core formation in the Earth.Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 198, pp. 1-16.MantleCore chemistry

Abstract: A large number of siderophile (iron-loving) elements are also volatile, thus offering constraints on the origin of volatile elements in differentiated bodies such as Earth, Moon, Mars and Vesta. Metal-silicate partitioning data for many of these elements is lacking, making their overall mantle concentrations in these bodies difficult to model and origin difficult to distinguish between core formation and volatile depletion. To address this gap in understanding, we have undertaken systematic studies of four volatile siderophile elements - Sb, As, Ge and In - at variable temperature and variable Si content of metal. Several series were carried out at 1 GPa, and between 1500 and 1900 °C, for both C saturated and C-free conditions. The results show that temperature causes a decrease in the metal/silicate partition coefficient for all four elements. In addition, activity coefficients for each element have been determined and show a very strong dependence on Si content of Fe alloy. Si dissolved in metal significantly decreases the metal/silicate partition coefficients, at both 1600 and 1800 °C. The combination of temperature and Si content of the metal causes reduction of the metal-silicate partition coefficient to values that are close to those required for an origin of mantle As, Sb, Ge, and In concentrations by metal-silicate equilibrium processes. Combining these new results with previous studies on As, Sb, Ge, and In, allowed derivation of predictive expressions for metal/silicate partition coefficients for these elements which can then be applied to Earth. The expressions are applied to two scenarios for continuous accretion of Earth; specifically for constant and increasing fO2 during accretion. The results indicate that mantle concentrations of As, Sb, Ge, and In can be explained by metal-silicate equilibrium during an accretion scenario. The modeling is not especially sensitive to either scenario, although all element concentrations are explained better by a model with variable fO2. The specific effect of Si is important and calculations that include only S and C (and no Si) cannot reproduce the mantle As, Sb, Ge, and In concentrations. The final core composition in the variable fO2 model is 10.2% Si, 2% S, and 1.1% C (or XSi = 0.18, XS = 0.03, and XC = 0.04. These results suggest that core formation (involving a Si, S, and C-bearing metallic liquid) and accretion were the most important processes establishing many of Earth’s mantle volatile elements (indigenous), while post-core formation addition or re-equilibration (exogenous) was of secondary or minor importance.
DS201804-0701
2018
Huguet, L., Van Oman, J.A., Hauck, S.A., Willard, M.A.Earth's inner core nucleation paradox.Earth and Planteray Science Letters, Vol. 487, pp. 1-17.MantleCore

Abstract: The conventional view of Earth's inner core is that it began to crystallize at Earth's center when the temperature dropped below the melting point of the iron alloy and has grown steadily since that time as the core continued to cool. However, this model neglects the energy barrier to the formation of the first stable crystal nucleus, which is commonly represented in terms of the critical supercooling required to overcome the barrier. Using constraints from experiments, simulations, and theory, we show that spontaneous crystallization in a homogeneous liquid iron alloy at Earth's core pressures requires a critical supercooling of order 1000 K, which is too large to be a plausible mechanism for the origin of Earth's inner core. We consider mechanisms that can lower the nucleation barrier substantially. Each has caveats, yet the inner core exists: this is the nucleation paradox. Heterogeneous nucleation on a solid metallic substrate tends to have a low energy barrier and offers the most straightforward solution to the paradox, but solid metal would probably have to be delivered from the mantle and such events are unlikely to have been common. A delay in nucleation, whether due to a substantial nucleation energy barrier, or late introduction of a low energy substrate, would lead to an initial phase of rapid inner core growth from a supercooled state. Such rapid growth may lead to distinctive crystallization texturing that might be observable seismically. It would also generate a spike in chemical and thermal buoyancy that could affect the geomagnetic field significantly. Solid metal introduced to Earth's center before it reached saturation could also provide a nucleation substrate, if large enough to escape complete dissolution. Inner core growth, in this case, could begin earlier and start more slowly than standard thermal models predict.
DS201806-1250
2018
Shule, Yu, Garnero, E.J.Ultralow velocity zone locations: a global assessment.Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, Vol. 19, 2, pp. 396-414.Mantlecore, boundary

Abstract: We have compiled all previous ultralow velocity zone (ULVZ) studies, and digitized their core?mantle boundary (CMB) sampling locations. For studies that presented sampling locations based on infinite frequency ray theory, we approximated Fresnel zones onto a 0.5° × 0.5° grid. Results for these studies were separated according to wave type: (1) core?reflected phases, which have a single location of ULVZ sampling (ScS, ScP, PcP), (2) core waves that can sample ULVZs at the core entrance and exit locations of the wave (e.g., SPdKS, PKKP, and PKP), and (3) waves which have uncertainties of ULVZ location due to long CMB sampling paths, e.g., diffracted energy sampling over a broad region (Pdiff, Sdiff). For studies that presented specific modeled ULVZ geographical shapes or PKP scatter probability maps, we digitized the regions. We present summary maps of the ULVZ coverage, as well as published locations arguing against ULVZ presence. A key finding is that there is not a simple mapping between lowermost mantle reduced tomographic velocities and observed ULVZ locations, especially given the presence of ULVZs outside of lowermost mantle large low velocity provinces (LLVPs). Significant location uncertainty exists for some of the ULVZ imaging wave types. Nonetheless, this compilation supports a compositionally distinct origin for at least some ULVZs. ULVZs are more likely to be found near LLVP boundaries, however, their relationship to overlying surface locations of hot spots are less obvious. The new digital ULVZ database is freely available for download.
DS201807-1511
2018
Manning, C.E.Fluids of the lower crust: deep is different.Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Vol. 46, pp. 67-97.Mantlecore, boundary

Abstract: Deep fluids are important for the evolution and properties of the lower continental and arc crust in tectonically active settings. They comprise four components: H2O, nonpolar gases, salts, and rock-derived solutes. Contrasting behavior of H2O-gas and H2O-salt mixtures yields immiscibility and potential separation of phases with different chemical properties. Equilibrium thermodynamic modeling of fluid-rock interaction using simple ionic species known from shallow-crustal systems yields solutions too dilute to be consistent with experiments and resistivity surveys, especially if CO2 is added. Therefore, additional species must be present, and H2O-salt solutions likely explain much of the evidence for fluid action in high-pressure settings. At low salinity, H2O-rich fluids are powerful solvents for aluminosilicate rock components that are dissolved as polymerized clusters. Addition of salts changes solubility patterns, but aluminosilicate contents may remain high. Fluids with Xsalt = 0.05 to 0.4 in equilibrium with model crustal rocks have bulk conductivities of 10?1.5 to 100 S/m at porosity of 0.001. Such fluids are consistent with observed conductivity anomalies and are capable of the mass transfer seen in metamorphic rocks exhumed from the lower crust.
DS201810-2313
2018
Finkelstein, G.J., Jackson, J.M., Said, A., Alatas, A., Leu, B.M., Sturhahn, W., Toellner, T.S.Strongly anisotropic magnesiowustite in Earth's lower mantle. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, doi.org/10.1029/ 2017JB015349Mantlecore mantle boundary

Abstract: The juxtaposition of a liquid iron?dominant alloy against a mixture of silicate and oxide minerals at Earth's core?mantle boundary is associated with a wide range of complex seismological features. One category of observed structures is ultralow?velocity zones, which are thought to correspond to either aggregates of partially molten material or solid, iron?enriched assemblages. We measured the phonon dispersion relations of (Mg,Fe) O magnesiowüstite containing 76 mol % FeO, a candidate ultralow?velocity zone phase, at high pressures using high?energy resolution inelastic X?ray scattering. From these measurements, we find that magnesiowüstite becomes strongly elastically anisotropic with increasing pressure, potentially contributing to a significant proportion of seismic anisotropy detected near the base of the mantle.
DS201810-2351
2018
Mahan, B., Siebert, J., Blanchard, I., Moynier, F.Investigating Earth's formation history through copper & sulfur metal silicate partitioning during core-mantle differentiation.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, doi:10.1029/2018JB015991Mantlecore mantle boundary

Abstract: Experiments wherein molten metal and silicate (rock?building) phases un?mix themselves due to their physical properties, i.e. metal?silicate partitioning, can be conducted at the high temperatures and pressures (HP?HT) that characterized Earth's differentiation into a core and mantle. The redistribution of elements between the metal and silicate phases ? their partitioning ? during this process can be measured and mathematically described, then placed into numerical models to better understand Earth's formation history. Here, we have mathematically characterized the HP?HT partitioning of copper, combined this with results for sulfur from literature, and input these characterizations into numerical models that track their distribution between Earth's core and mantle as it grows to its present mass. Copper and sulfur were chosen because they display different sensitivities to the physical mechanisms that govern planetary formation, and we can leverage this to better understand Earth's formation and differentiation history. Our results indicate that ~75% of Earth's precursor materials grew incrementally from relatively small bits of material ? on average ~0.1% of Earth's mass or less ? that is most compositionally similar to meteorite classes that are made up of iron?rich metal and silicate solids (chondrules) that are depleted in easily vaporized (volatile) elements, especially sulfur.
DS201811-2570
2018
Ernst, R.E., Davies, D.R., Jowitt, S.M., Campbell, I.H.When do mantle plumes destroy diamonds? ( review )Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 502, pp. 244-252.Russia, Canada, Ontario, Attawapiskatkimberlite, core boundary

Abstract: Mantle plumes are hot buoyant upwellings that rise from Earth's core-mantle-boundary to its surface where they can produce large igneous provinces (LIPs) and volcanic tracks, such as the Siberian Traps and the Hawaiian Emperor chain, respectively. We show that flattened mantle plume heads, which can have radii of >1200 km in the uppermost mantle, can heat the overlying lithospheric mantle to temperatures above the diamond stability field. As a consequence, they can destroy diamonds within the roots of Archean cratons, the principal source of diamonds in kimberlites. We quantitatively demonstrate that there is a ‘sour spot’ for this effect that occurs when lithospheric thicknesses are 165-185 km and the plume has a temperature of >150?°C above background mantle. Our model explains why the kimberlites associated with the 370 Ma Yakutsk-Vilyui plume in the Siberian craton are diamondiferous whilst those associated with the younger 250 Ma Siberian Traps plume are barren. We also show that the time required to restore the pre-plume thermal structure of the lithosphere is ca. 75-120 Myr, and that destroyed diamonds may regrow once the plume's thermal effect dissipates. The 1100 Ma Kyle Lake and adjacent 180-150 Ma Attawapiskat kimberlites in the southern Superior craton exemplify this, where the older kimberlites are associated with a narrower diamond window (<30 km) in comparison with the ca. 85 km diamond window of the younger Attawapiskat field.
DS201904-0771
2019
Reali, R., Jackson, J.M., Van Orman, J., Bower, D.J., Carrez, P., Cordier, P.Modeling viscosity of ( Mg, Fe)O at lowermost mantle conditions.Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Vol. 287, pp. 65-75.Mantlecore-mantle boundary

Abstract: The viscosity of the lower mantle results from the rheological behavior of its two main constituent minerals, aluminous (Mg,Fe)SiO3 bridgmanite and (Mg,Fe)O ferropericlase. Understanding the transport properties of lower mantle aggregates is of primary importance in geophysics and it is a challenging task, due to the extreme time-varying conditions to which such aggregates are subjected. In particular, viscosity is a crucial transport property that can vary over several orders of magnitude. It thus has a first-order control on the structure and dynamics of the mantle. Here we focus on the creep behavior of (Mg,Fe)O at the bottom of the lower mantle, where the presence of thermo-chemical anomalies such as ultralow-velocity zones (ULVZ) may significantly alter the viscosity contrast characterizing this region. Two different iron concentrations of (Mg1-xFex)O are considered: one mirroring the average composition of ferropericlase throughout most of the lower mantle (x?=?0.20) and another representing a candidate magnesiowüstite component of ULVZs near the base of the mantle (x?=?0.84). The investigated pressure-temperature conditions span from 120?GPa and 2800?K, corresponding to the average geotherm at this depth, to core-mantle boundary conditions of 135?GPa and 3800?K. In this study, dislocation creep of (Mg,Fe)O is investigated by dislocation dynamics (DD) simulations, a modeling tool which considers the collective motion and interactions of dislocations. To model their behavior, a 2.5 dimensional dislocation dynamics approach is employed. Within this method, both glide and climb mechanisms can be taken into account, and the interplay of these features results in a steady-state condition. This allows the retrieval of the creep strain rates at different temperatures, pressures, applied stresses and iron concentrations across the (Mg,Fe)O solid solution, providing information on the viscosity for these materials. A particularly low viscosity is obtained for magnesiowüstite with respect to ferropericlase, the difference being around 10 orders of magnitude. Thus, the final section of this work is devoted to the assessment of the dynamic implications of such a weak phase within ULVZs, in terms of the viscosity contrast with respect to the surrounding lowermost mantle.
DS202002-0222
2019
Zhang, Y., Nelson, P., Dygert, N., Lin, J-F.Fe alloy slurry and a compacting cumulate pile across Earth's inner-core boundary.Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, doi:10.1029/ 2019JB017792MantleCore boundary

Abstract: Seismic observations show a reduced P wave velocity gradient layer at the bottom ~280 km of the outer core and a hemispherical dichotomy at the top ~50-200 km of the inner core compared to the one?dimensional Preliminary reference Earth model (PREM). These seismic features manifest physical and chemical phenomena linked to thermal evolution and formation processes of the inner core. We have developed a physical model to explain these seismic features. At the inner?outer boundary, the crystallization of Fe alloy co?exists with the residue melt producing a “snowing” slurry layer (F layer), consistent with observed seismic velocity gradient. Solid Fe alloy crystals accumulate and eventually compact at the top of the inner core, and may exhibit lateral variations in thickness between the east?west hemispheres. Our model can explain the east?west asymmetry observed in the seismic velocity. Our model uses mineral physics and seismological results to provide a holistic view of the physical and chemical processes for the inner?core growth over geological time.
DS202008-1386
2020
Duncombe, J.Earth's core is in the hot seat.Eos, 101, doi,org./10.1029 /EO145531 June 24, MantleCore age

Abstract: How old is Earth’s inner core? High-pressure and high-temperature experiments suggest that our planet’s inner furnace may be much younger than expected.
DS202009-1621
2020
CNNThe Earth's core is younger than previously believed, according to new research.cnn.com, Aug. 25, 1/2p.MantleNews item - core
DS202012-2253
2020
Tian, D., Lv, M., Wei, S.S., Dorfman, S.M., Shearer, P.M.Global variations of Earth's 520- and 550-km discontinuities.Earth and Planetary Letters, Vol. 552, 116600, 13p. PdfMantlecore-mantle boundary

Abstract: We investigate seismic discontinuities in the mantle transition zone (MTZ) by analyzing SS precursors recorded at global seismic stations. Our observations confirm the global existence of the 520-km discontinuity. Although substantial regional depth variations in the 520-km discontinuity are generally correlated with temperature in the mid-MTZ, they cannot be fully explained by the Clapeyron slope of the wadsleyite-ringwoodite phase transition, suggesting both thermal and compositional heterogeneities in the MTZ. A second discontinuity at ?560-km depth, previously interpreted as splitting of the 520-km discontinuity, is most commonly detected in cold subduction zones and hot mantle regions. The depth separation between the 520- and 560-km discontinuities varies from ?80 km in cold regions to ?40 km in hot areas. The exsolution of calcium-perovskite (Ca-pv) from majorite garnet has been proposed to explain the velocity and density changes across the 560-km discontinuity. However, the gradual exsolution of perovskite and partitioning of Ca and Al between perovskite and garnet appear inconsistent with the relatively “sharp” discontinuity in seismic observations and thus need to be revisited in the future. Nevertheless, because the only known transition in major minerals at this depth in the MTZ is the formation of Ca-pv, the existence of the 560-km discontinuity may imply localized high calcium concentrations in the mid-MTZ possibly related to the recycling of oceanic crust.
DM202105-0843
2021
Live ScienceA remnant of a protoplanet may be hiding inside Earth.livescience.com, March 29, 2p.MantleNews item - core
DS202105-0775
2021
Live ScienceA remnant of a protoplanet may be hiding inside Earth.livescience.com, March 29, 2p.Mantlecore - boundary
DS202203-0350
2022
He, Y., Sun, S., Kim, D.Y., Jang, B.G., Li, H., Mao, H-K.Superionic iron alloys and their seismic velocities in Earth's inner core.Nature, Vol. 602, pp. 258-276. 18p.Mantlecore

Abstract: Earth’s inner core (IC) is less dense than pure iron, indicating the existence of light elements within it1. Silicon, sulfur, carbon, oxygen and hydrogen have been suggested to be the candidates2,3, and the properties of iron-light-element alloys have been studied to constrain the IC composition4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. Light elements have a substantial influence on the seismic velocities4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, the melting temperatures14,15,16,17 and the thermal conductivities18,19 of iron alloys. However, the state of the light elements in the IC is rarely considered. Here, using ab initio molecular dynamics simulations, we find that hydrogen, oxygen and carbon in hexagonal close-packed iron transform to a superionic state under the IC conditions, showing high diffusion coefficients like a liquid. This suggests that the IC can be in a superionic state rather than a normal solid state. The liquid-like light elements lead to a substantial reduction in the seismic velocities, which approach the seismological observations of the IC20,21. The substantial decrease in shear-wave velocity provides an explanation for the soft IC21. In addition, the light-element convection has a potential influence on the IC seismological structure and magnetic field.
DS202205-0694
2022
Katsura, T.A revised adiabatic temperature profile for the mantle. 410 discontinuityJournal of Geophysical Research, Solid Earth, Vol. 127, 2, 10.1029/2021JB023562 11p. PdfMantlecore-boundary

Abstract: This study estimates the temperature profile of the Earth's mantle by generally following the approach described in Katsura et al. (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2010.07.001. The estimation consists of two steps. First, the temperature at the 410-km seismic discontinuity (D410), at which the seismic wave velocities abruptly increase almost everywhere in the mantle, is evaluated. The D410 is usually attributed to the olivine-wadsleyite transition in peridotite. Comparing the globally averaged D410 depth with the phase diagram of the olivine-wadsleyite transition yields a D410 temperature of 1839 (38) K. Second, this temperature is extrapolated to shallower and deeper regions by assuming that the heat is mainly transferred by convection in the mantle. The temperature gradient in such cases is the product of the thermal expansion coefficient and the temperature divided by the density and the heat capacity. The thermal expansion coefficients of the major mantle mineral are obtained by recalculating our previous experimental data. We found that the temperatures at 50-km depth, the bottom of the mantle transition zone, the top of the lower mantle, and 2,800-km depth are found to be 1646 (35), 1994 (40), 1960 (40), and 2587 (60) K, respectively. The 50-km depth temperature is slightly higher but generally agrees to that estimated from the melting of depleted peridotite.
DS202205-0728
2022
Voosen, P.The planet inside.Science, Vol. 376, 6588, pp. 18-22. 10.1126/wcience.abq2090MantleCore-mantle

Abstract: Earth’s magnetic field, nearly as old as the planet itself, protects life from damaging space radiation. But 565 million years ago, the field was sputtering, dropping to 10% of today’s strength, according to a recent discovery. Then, almost miraculously, over the course of just a few tens of millions of years, it regained its strength—just in time for the sudden profusion of complex multicellular life known as the Cambrian explosion. What could have caused the rapid revival? Increasingly, scientists believe it was the birth of Earth’s inner core, a sphere of solid iron that sits within the molten outer core, where churning metal generates the planet’s magnetic field. Once the inner core was born, possibly 4 billion years after the planet itself, its treelike growth—accreting a few millimeters per year at its surface—would have turbocharged motions in the outer core, reviving the faltering magnetic field and renewing the protective shield for life. “The inner core regenerated Earth’s magnetic field at a really interesting time in evolution,” says John Tarduno, a geophysicist at the University of Rochester. “What would have happened if it didn’t form?” Just why and how the inner core was born at that moment is one of many lingering puzzles about the Pluto-size orb 5000 kilo meters underfoot. “The inner core is a planet within a planet,” says Hrvoje Tkal?i?, a seismologist at Australian National University (ANU)—with its own topography, its own spin rate, its own structure. “It’s beneath our feet and yet we still don’t understand some big questions,” Tkal?i? says. But researchers are beginning to chip away at those questions. Using the rare seismic waves from earthquakes or nuclear tests that penetrate or reflect off the inner core, seismologists have discovered it spins independently from the rest of the planet. Armed with complex computer models, theorists have predicted the structure and weird behavior of iron alloys crushed by the weight of the world. And experimentalists are close to confirming some of those predictions in the lab by re-creating the extreme temperatures and pressures of the inner core. Arwen Deuss, a geophysicist at Utrecht University, feels a sense of anticipation that may resemble the mood in the 1960s, when researchers were observing seafloor spreading and on the cusp of discovering plate tectonics, the theory that makes sense of Earth’s surface. “We have all these observations now,” she says. It’s simply a matter of putting them all together.

 
 

You can return to the Top of this page


Copyright © 2024 Kaiser Research Online, All Rights Reserved